linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/17] amba: PM fixups for amba bus and some amba drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140204184909.GT22609@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 4 Feb 2014 18:49:09 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...pv.it>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
	Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] amba: PM fixups for amba bus and some amba drivers

On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 04:58:41PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:

> The fixes for the amba bus needs to be merged prior to the other, thus I think
> it could make sense to merge this complete patchset through Russell's tree,
> if he and the other maintainers think this is okay.

What are the actual dependencies for the SPI bit?  AFAICT it's probably
the first patch needs the bus updating?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)