linux-kernel - Re: mips octeon memory model questions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 4 Feb 2014 10:58:40 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mips <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: mips octeon memory model questions

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> Still doesn't make sense, because if we need the first sync to stop
> writes from being re-ordered with the ll-sc, we also need the second
> sync to avoid the same.

Presumably octeon doesn't do speculative writes, only *buffered* writes.

So writes move down, not up.

But it looks like Cavium is one of those clown companies that have a
"contact us" button for technical documentation rather than actually
making it available.

Christ, why would anybody do business with a tech company that hides
technical details? Seriously, that just stinks of "we have so many
bugs that we cannot make the documentation available".

                  Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/