| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <52F14517.5080102@fb.com> Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 14:52:55 -0500 From: Chris Mason <clm@...com> To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> CC: <dsterba@...e.cz>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs On 02/04/2014 02:50 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 01:18:40PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote: >> On Mon 03 Feb 2014 12:54:05 PM EST, David Sterba wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 04:52:54PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote: >>>> Chris Mason (3) commits (+64/-32): >>>> Btrfs: setup inode location during btrfs_init_inode_locked (+9/-9) >>>> Btrfs: don't use ram_bytes for uncompressed inline items (+52/-22) >>> >>> The patches are CC: stable, but haven't gone through the mailinglist. >>> Are they still going to be picked by stable? >> >> We do need both in -stable, I'll help with backports. > > Very few of the patches you marked for -stable, actually would apply (or > build once applied.) Can you please send a set of patches you want > applied? Yes, I'll make a tree for you to pull. Between the acls and the block layer changes, we had a lot of little things that will make it hard to apply them directly, but the backports are pretty easy. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists