Message-Id: <20140204210225.635220242@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Tue,  4 Feb 2014 13:02:46 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org,
	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 103/104] powerpc: Fix the setup of CPU-to-Node mappings during CPU online

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

commit d4edc5b6c480a0917e61d93d55531d7efa6230be upstream.

On POWER platforms, the hypervisor can notify the guest kernel about dynamic
changes in the cpu-numa associativity (VPHN topology update). Hence the
cpu-to-node mappings that we got from the firmware during boot, may no longer
be valid after such updates. This is handled using the arch_update_cpu_topology()
hook in the scheduler, and the sched-domains are rebuilt according to the new
mappings.

But unfortunately, at the moment, CPU hotplug ignores these updated mappings
and instead queries the firmware for the cpu-to-numa relationships and uses
them during CPU online. So the kernel can end up assigning wrong NUMA nodes
to CPUs during subsequent CPU hotplug online operations (after booting).

Further, a particularly problematic scenario can result from this bug:
On POWER platforms, the SMT mode can be switched between 1, 2, 4 (and even 8)
threads per core. The switch to Single-Threaded (ST) mode is performed by
offlining all except the first CPU thread in each core. Switching back to
SMT mode involves onlining those other threads back, in each core.

Now consider this scenario:

1. During boot, the kernel gets the cpu-to-node mappings from the firmware
   and assigns the CPUs to NUMA nodes appropriately, during CPU online.

2. Later on, the hypervisor updates the cpu-to-node mappings dynamically and
   communicates this update to the kernel. The kernel in turn updates its
   cpu-to-node associations and rebuilds its sched domains. Everything is
   fine so far.

3. Now, the user switches the machine from SMT to ST mode (say, by running
   ppc64_cpu --smt=1). This involves offlining all except 1 thread in each
   core.

4. The user then tries to switch back from ST to SMT mode (say, by running
   ppc64_cpu --smt=4), and this involves onlining those threads back. Since
   CPU hotplug ignores the new mappings, it queries the firmware and tries to
   associate the newly onlined sibling threads to the old NUMA nodes. This
   results in sibling threads within the same core getting associated with
   different NUMA nodes, which is incorrect.

   The scheduler's build-sched-domains code gets thoroughly confused with this
   and enters an infinite loop and causes soft-lockups, as explained in detail
   in commit 3be7db6ab (powerpc: VPHN topology change updates all siblings).

So to fix this, use the numa_cpu_lookup_table to remember the updated
cpu-to-node mappings, and use them during CPU hotplug online operations.
Further, we also need to ensure that all threads in a core are assigned to a
common NUMA node, irrespective of whether all those threads were online during
the topology update. To achieve this, we take care not to use cpu_sibling_mask()
since it is not hotplug invariant. Instead, we use cpu_first_sibling_thread()
and set up the mappings manually using the 'threads_per_core' value for that
particular platform. This helps us ensure that we don't hit this bug with any
combination of CPU hotplug and SMT mode switching.

Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h |   10 ++++-
 arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c              |   70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
@@ -22,7 +22,15 @@ struct device_node;
 
 static inline int cpu_to_node(int cpu)
 {
-	return numa_cpu_lookup_table[cpu];
+	int nid;
+
+	nid = numa_cpu_lookup_table[cpu];
+
+	/*
+	 * During early boot, the numa-cpu lookup table might not have been
+	 * setup for all CPUs yet. In such cases, default to node 0.
+	 */
+	return (nid < 0) ? 0 : nid;
 }
 
 #define parent_node(node)	(node)
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
@@ -31,6 +31,8 @@
 #include <asm/sparsemem.h>
 #include <asm/prom.h>
 #include <asm/smp.h>
+#include <asm/cputhreads.h>
+#include <asm/topology.h>
 #include <asm/firmware.h>
 #include <asm/paca.h>
 #include <asm/hvcall.h>
@@ -152,9 +154,22 @@ static void __init get_node_active_regio
 	}
 }
 
-static void map_cpu_to_node(int cpu, int node)
+static void reset_numa_cpu_lookup_table(void)
+{
+	unsigned int cpu;
+
+	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+		numa_cpu_lookup_table[cpu] = -1;
+}
+
+static void update_numa_cpu_lookup_table(unsigned int cpu, int node)
 {
 	numa_cpu_lookup_table[cpu] = node;
+}
+
+static void map_cpu_to_node(int cpu, int node)
+{
+	update_numa_cpu_lookup_table(cpu, node);
 
 	dbg("adding cpu %d to node %d\n", cpu, node);
 
@@ -519,11 +534,24 @@ static int of_drconf_to_nid_single(struc
  */
 static int __cpuinit numa_setup_cpu(unsigned long lcpu)
 {
-	int nid = 0;
-	struct device_node *cpu = of_get_cpu_node(lcpu, NULL);
+	int nid;
+	struct device_node *cpu;
+
+	/*
+	 * If a valid cpu-to-node mapping is already available, use it
+	 * directly instead of querying the firmware, since it represents
+	 * the most recent mapping notified to us by the platform (eg: VPHN).
+	 */
+	if ((nid = numa_cpu_lookup_table[lcpu]) >= 0) {
+		map_cpu_to_node(lcpu, nid);
+		return nid;
+	}
+
+	cpu = of_get_cpu_node(lcpu, NULL);
 
 	if (!cpu) {
 		WARN_ON(1);
+		nid = 0;
 		goto out;
 	}
 
@@ -1066,6 +1094,7 @@ void __init do_init_bootmem(void)
 	 */
 	setup_node_to_cpumask_map();
 
+	reset_numa_cpu_lookup_table();
 	register_cpu_notifier(&ppc64_numa_nb);
 	cpu_numa_callback(&ppc64_numa_nb, CPU_UP_PREPARE,
 			  (void *)(unsigned long)boot_cpuid);
@@ -1443,6 +1472,33 @@ static int update_cpu_topology(void *dat
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int update_lookup_table(void *data)
+{
+	struct topology_update_data *update;
+
+	if (!data)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/*
+	 * Upon topology update, the numa-cpu lookup table needs to be updated
+	 * for all threads in the core, including offline CPUs, to ensure that
+	 * future hotplug operations respect the cpu-to-node associativity
+	 * properly.
+	 */
+	for (update = data; update; update = update->next) {
+		int nid, base, j;
+
+		nid = update->new_nid;
+		base = cpu_first_thread_sibling(update->cpu);
+
+		for (j = 0; j < threads_per_core; j++) {
+			update_numa_cpu_lookup_table(base + j, nid);
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * Update the node maps and sysfs entries for each cpu whose home node
  * has changed. Returns 1 when the topology has changed, and 0 otherwise.
@@ -1511,6 +1567,14 @@ int arch_update_cpu_topology(void)
 
 	stop_machine(update_cpu_topology, &updates[0], &updated_cpus);
 
+	/*
+	 * Update the numa-cpu lookup table with the new mappings, even for
+	 * offline CPUs. It is best to perform this update from the stop-
+	 * machine context.
+	 */
+	stop_machine(update_lookup_table, &updates[0],
+					cpumask_of(raw_smp_processor_id()));
+
 	for (ud = &updates[0]; ud; ud = ud->next) {
 		unregister_cpu_under_node(ud->cpu, ud->old_nid);
 		register_cpu_under_node(ud->cpu, ud->new_nid);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists