linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.13 137/140] Btrfs: setup inode location during btrfs_init_inode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue,  4 Feb 2014 13:12:04 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.13 137/140] Btrfs: setup inode location during btrfs_init_inode_locked

3.13-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Chris Mason <clm@...com>

commit 90d3e592e99b8e374ead2b45148abf506493a959 upstream.

We have a race during inode init because the BTRFS_I(inode)->location is setup
after the inode hash table lock is dropped.  btrfs_find_actor uses the location
field, so our search might not find an existing inode in the hash table if we
race with the inode init code.

This commit changes things to setup the location field sooner.  Also the find actor now
uses only the location objectid to match inodes.  For inode hashing, we just
need a unique and stable test, it doesn't have to reflect the inode numbers we
show to userland.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/btrfs/inode.c |   18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
 #include "hash.h"
 
 struct btrfs_iget_args {
-	u64 ino;
+	struct btrfs_key *location;
 	struct btrfs_root *root;
 };
 
@@ -4818,7 +4818,9 @@ again:
 static int btrfs_init_locked_inode(struct inode *inode, void *p)
 {
 	struct btrfs_iget_args *args = p;
-	inode->i_ino = args->ino;
+	inode->i_ino = args->location->objectid;
+	memcpy(&BTRFS_I(inode)->location, args->location,
+	       sizeof(*args->location));
 	BTRFS_I(inode)->root = args->root;
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -4826,19 +4828,19 @@ static int btrfs_init_locked_inode(struc
 static int btrfs_find_actor(struct inode *inode, void *opaque)
 {
 	struct btrfs_iget_args *args = opaque;
-	return args->ino == btrfs_ino(inode) &&
+	return args->location->objectid == BTRFS_I(inode)->location.objectid &&
 		args->root == BTRFS_I(inode)->root;
 }
 
 static struct inode *btrfs_iget_locked(struct super_block *s,
-				       u64 objectid,
+				       struct btrfs_key *location,
 				       struct btrfs_root *root)
 {
 	struct inode *inode;
 	struct btrfs_iget_args args;
-	unsigned long hashval = btrfs_inode_hash(objectid, root);
+	unsigned long hashval = btrfs_inode_hash(location->objectid, root);
 
-	args.ino = objectid;
+	args.location = location;
 	args.root = root;
 
 	inode = iget5_locked(s, hashval, btrfs_find_actor,
@@ -4855,13 +4857,11 @@ struct inode *btrfs_iget(struct super_bl
 {
 	struct inode *inode;
 
-	inode = btrfs_iget_locked(s, location->objectid, root);
+	inode = btrfs_iget_locked(s, location, root);
 	if (!inode)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
 	if (inode->i_state & I_NEW) {
-		BTRFS_I(inode)->root = root;
-		memcpy(&BTRFS_I(inode)->location, location, sizeof(*location));
 		btrfs_read_locked_inode(inode);
 		if (!is_bad_inode(inode)) {
 			inode_tree_add(inode);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/