linux-kernel - Re: igb and bnx2: "NETDEV WATCHDOG: transmit queue timed out" when skb has huge linear buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52F15C85.7050200@citrix.com>
Date:	Tue, 4 Feb 2014 21:32:53 +0000
From:	Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>
To:	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>, Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...aman.hu>
CC:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
	Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
	Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>,
	Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
	Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>,
	Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
	Alex Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
	John Ronciak <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
	Tushar Dave <tushar.n.dave@...el.com>,
	Akeem G Abodunrin <akeem.g.abodunrin@...el.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: igb and bnx2: "NETDEV WATCHDOG: transmit queue timed out" when
 skb has huge linear buffer

On 31/01/14 18:56, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 07:08:11PM +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've experienced some queue timeout problems mentioned in the
>> subject with igb and bnx2 cards. I haven't seen them on other cards
>> so far. I'm using XenServer with 3.10 Dom0 kernel (however igb were
>> already updated to latest version), and there are Windows guests
>> sending data through these cards. I noticed these problems in XenRT
>> test runs, and I know that they usually mean some lost interrupt
>> problem or other hardware error, but in my case they started to
>> appear more often, and they are likely connected to my netback grant
>> mapping patches. These patches causing skb's with huge (~64kb)
>> linear buffers to appear more often.
>> The reason for that is an old problem in the ring protocol:
>> originally the maximum amount of slots were linked to MAX_SKB_FRAGS,
>> as every slot ended up as a frag of the skb. When this value were
>> changed, netback had to cope with the situation by coalescing the
>> packets into fewer frags.
>> My patch series take a different approach: the leftover slots
>> (pages) were assigned to a new skb's frags, and that skb were
>> stashed to the frag_list of the first one. Then, before sending it
>> off to the stack it calls skb = skb_copy_expand(skb, 0, 0,
>> GFP_ATOMIC, __GFP_NOWARN), which basically creates a new skb and
>> copied all the data into it. As far as I understood, it put
>> everything into the linear buffer, which can amount to 64KB at most.
>> The original skb are freed then, and this new one were sent to the
>> stack.
>
> Just my two cents, if it is this case, you can try to call
> skb_copy_expand on every SKB netback receives to manually create SKBs
> with ~64KB linear buffer to see how it goes...

I've tried it, and it did break everything in a similar way, so that's a 
strong clue that the problem lies here. I've rewrote that part of my 
patches to do less modification, based on Malcolm's idea: netback pulls 
the first frag into linear buffer, then moves a frag from the frag_list 
skb into the first one. That seems to help, but so far I have only one 
relevant test result, I'm waiting for more results.

Zoli

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/