[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402041334110.26019@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 13:34:29 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: kosaki.motohiro@...il.com
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] __set_page_dirty uses spin_lock_irqsave instead of
spin_lock_irq
On Tue, 4 Feb 2014, kosaki.motohiro@...il.com wrote:
> From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
>
> To use spin_{un}lock_irq is dangerous if caller disabled interrupt.
> During aio buffer migration, we have a possibility to see the
> following call stack.
>
> aio_migratepage [disable interrupt]
> migrate_page_copy
> clear_page_dirty_for_io
> set_page_dirty
> __set_page_dirty_buffers
> __set_page_dirty
> spin_lock_irq
>
> This mean, current aio migration is a deadlockable. spin_lock_irqsave
> is a safer alternative and we should use it.
>
> Reported-by: David Rientjes rientjes@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists