linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] clocksource: timer-keystone: introduce clocksource driver for Keystone

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52F1668B.9040507@ti.com>
Date:	Tue, 4 Feb 2014 17:15:39 -0500
From:	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:	Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...com>, <rob@...dley.net>,
	<linux@....linux.org.uk>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <pawel.moll@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
	<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] clocksource: timer-keystone: introduce clocksource
 driver for Keystone

On Tuesday 04 February 2014 03:17 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Feb 2014, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
> 
> Please do not top post.
> 
>> It was so in v1. But it was decided to use explicit memory barriers,
>> because we're always sure the memory barriers are there and that
>> they're properly documented. Also in this case I don't need to add
>> keystone readl/writel relaxed function variants and to use mixed calls of
>> writel/writel_relaxed functions.
>>
>> See:
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg294941.html
> 
> Fair enough, but we want a proper explanation for explicit barriers in
> the code and not in some random discussion of patch version X on some
> random mailing list.
> 
> Aside of that it should be iowmb(), but I might miss something ...
> 
Agree. __iowmb() seems to be more appropriate.

Regards,
Santosh

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/