[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1391592486.11239.4.camel@pizza.hi.pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 10:28:06 +0100
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: srinivas.kandagatla@...com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Stuart Menefy <stuart.menefy@...com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...inux.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, stephen.gallimore@...com,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] ARM: STi reset controller support
Hi Srinivas,
Am Montag, den 03.02.2014, 14:27 +0000 schrieb
srinivas.kandagatla@...com:
> From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...com>
>
> Hi All,
>
> This patch series adds reset controller support for STi SOC series STiH415 and
> STiH416. It adds support for both power down reset and soft reset controllers.
> On STi series SOCs reset lines are wired up to system configuration registers.
> Most of the IPs on STi SOCs are left in reset state, so this driver is very
> important for other drivers to use the IPs.
>
> Patch 01: Adds reset controller based on system configuration registers via
> regmap.
>
> Patch 02, 03: adds STiH415 and STiH416 reset controller drivers.
>
> Patch 04, 05: adds STiH415 and STiH416 soft reset controllers.
>
> The final patch 06 selects reset controller in mach-sti Kconfig.
>
> I would like get this driver in to 3.15, so that its possible to add dt
> support for other IPs with reset lines. Without this patchset its impossible
> to add DT support to IPs with reset lines as reset line definition is in
> common header file in include/dt-bindings/.
>
> This reset controller will be used by gmac, i2c and st-ir drivers.
>
>
> Comments?
the patchset looks good to me for the soft resets. But for the powerdown
bits I am wondering whether the reset controller API is the right
abstraction. Depending on whether those bits really just put the IPs
into reset or there is some power gating / sequencing involved,
shouldn't this rather be handled as a set of pm domains?
I see that for example on STiH415 there are both soft resets and
powerdown bits for USB[012].
regards
Philipp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists