[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52F23DF4.7010901@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:34:44 +0100
From: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon.dev@...il.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>
CC: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, dev@...ux-sunxi.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Pekon Gupta <pekon@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/14] of: mtd: add documentation for nand-ecc-level
property
On 05/02/2014 12:15, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:53:32 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 03:34:13PM +0100, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
>>> nand-ecc-level property statically defines NAND chip's ECC requirements.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon.dev@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt | 3 +++
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt
>>> index 03855c8..0c962296 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt
>>> @@ -3,5 +3,8 @@
>>> - nand-ecc-mode : String, operation mode of the NAND ecc mode.
>>> Supported values are: "none", "soft", "hw", "hw_syndrome", "hw_oob_first",
>>> "soft_bch".
>>> +- nand-ecc-level : Two cells property defining the ECC level requirements.
>>> + The first cell represent the strength and the second cell the ECC block size.
>>> + E.g. : nand-ecc-level = <4 512>; /* 4 bits / 512 bytes */
>>> - nand-bus-width : 8 or 16 bus width if not present 8
>>> - nand-on-flash-bbt: boolean to enable on flash bbt option if not present false
>> Hm.. when was this proposal agreed? It seems I've missed the
>> discussion...
>>
>> FWIW, we've already proposed an equivalent one, but it received no
>> feedback from the devicetree maintainers:
> Sorry, binding review has become a huge undertaking.
>
>> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/58764
>>
>> Maybe we can discuss about it now?
>>
>> nand-ecc-strength : integer ECC required strength.
>> nand-ecc-size : integer step size associated to the ECC strength.
> I'm okay with either, but the above binding is indeed more readable.
That's fine by me, if everybody agrees, let's go for the
nand-ecc-strength/nand-ecc-size couple then.
I'll rebase next version of my series on Ezequiel's patch providing
these OF helpers.
Best Regards,
Boris
>
> g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists