[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1391607995.13157.24.camel@localhost>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:46:35 +0100
From: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: linux-audit@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2.1] audit: Only use the syscall slowpath when syscall
audit rules exist
On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 11:11 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> +void audit_inc_n_rules()
> +{
> + struct task_struct *p, *g;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + read_lock_irqsave(&tasklist_lock, flags);
> + if (audit_n_rules++ == 0) {
I know it's right, but it's too clever for me :) If we do end up
adding something like this Can we just do:
if (!audit_n_rules) {}
audit_n_rules++
I like dumb code :)
> + do_each_thread(g, p) {
> + if (p->audit_context)
> + set_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT);
> + } while_each_thread(g, p);
> + }
> + read_unlock_irqrestore(&tasklist_lock, flags);
> +}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists