linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/10] watchdog: xilinx: Add missing binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201402051500.02408.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Wed, 5 Feb 2014 15:00:02 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	monstr@...str.eu
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] watchdog: xilinx: Add missing binding

On Wednesday 05 February 2014, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 02/05/2014 10:36 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 February 2014, Michal Simek wrote:
> > Still, the choice of putting the timeout into DT in terms of
> > cycles rather than miliseconds wasn't ideal from an interface
> > perspective and we should change that if/when we do a generic
> > binding. I can definitely see where it's coming from for your
> > case, as the cycle count totally makes sense from an FPGA
> > tool perspective...
> 
> Thanks. I take this like ACK for this current binding description.
> 

Yes, please add my 'Acked-by'.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/