lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANq1E4Q6A1p4HXvx=ynRhAs+mmedz4tn+dQ9et_jb6SdPAgdsA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 5 Feb 2014 15:05:07 +0100
From:	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
To:	Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Cc:	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
	systemd Mailing List <systemd-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] tty: Set correct tty name in 'active'
 sysfs attribute

Hi

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com> wrote:
> On 02/05/2014 07:53 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> The 'active' sysfs attribute should refer to the currently
>>> active tty devices the console is running on, not the currently
>>> active console.
>>> The console structure doesn't refer to any device in sysfs,
>>> only the tty the console is running on has.
>>> So we need to print out the tty names in 'active', not
>>> the console names.
>>>
>>> Cc: Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>
>>> Cc: Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Werner Fink <werner@...e.de>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>>>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
>>> index c74a00a..17db8ca 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
>>> @@ -3545,9 +3545,19 @@ static ssize_t show_cons_active(struct device
>>> *dev,
>>>                  if (i >= ARRAY_SIZE(cs))
>>>                          break;
>>>          }
>>> -       while (i--)
>>> +       while (i--) {
>>> +               const struct tty_driver *driver;
>>> +               const char *name = cs[i]->name;
>>> +               int index = cs[i]->index;
>>> +
>>> +               driver = cs[i]->device(cs[i], &index);
>>> +               if (driver) {
>>> +                       index += driver->name_base;
>>> +                       name = driver->name;
>>> +               }
>>>                  count += sprintf(buf + count, "%s%d%c",
>>> -                                cs[i]->name, cs[i]->index, i ? '
>>> ':'\n');
>>> +                                name, index, i ? ' ':'\n');
>>> +       }
>>
>>
>> Nice catch and indeed, systemd already relies on these names to be
>> identical to their char-dev name. Fortunately, VTs and most serial
>> devices register the console with the same name as the TTY, so we're
>> fine.
>
>
> What device did this trip over?

I haven't seen one so far, but to me it's a coincident, not something
we should rely on.

> Also, this file is not private to systemd. Maybe these changes should
> be forked into a different sysfs attribute, "active_devices"?

What's the use-case to return the name of the console-driver? There is
no way for user-space to read active console-drivers anywhere so I
think returning the TTY makes more sense. We already have working
user-space that can spawn gettys on active consoles via this file. I
am open to change this to "active_devices" as the existing interface
was clearly not designed to return the device-names.

However, given the fact that both matched so far, I think changing the
existing interface to the only user I am aware of is better than
adding a new interface just to keep this unused attribute. But
obviously it's the maintainer's/your decision and you might know
user-space which requires the console-names instead of the tty-names.
So please let us know which way to go as we would like to see a
reliable way to match active consoles to TTY devices for automated
getty-startup.

Thanks
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ