linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v3 4/5] ASoC: tda998x: adjust the audio hw parameters from EDID

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 5 Feb 2014 14:08:08 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Cc:	Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v3 4/5] ASoC: tda998x: adjust the audio hw
 parameters from EDID

On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 02:31:09PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 02/05/2014 12:18 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

> >...as previously requested.  I know there was some discusion of broader
> >moves to factor this stuff out but it'd still be good to keep it
> >separated out even prior to a final non-EDID based solution so it's
> >easier to refactor.

> I think it will always be EDID (or ELD) based. As I understood it
> the re-factoring Takashi was talking about is related to how this
> data is passed from the graphics driver to the audio driver. The way

Right, the data of course has to come from there originally, it's about
how we pass the data and updates to it around.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)