[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140205005631.GA7664@verge.net.au>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 09:56:31 +0900
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] ARM: shmobile: RSPI RZ and QSPI SoC and board
integration
Magnus, could you Ack these or otherwise?
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 04:23:54PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Simon, Magnus,
>
> This patch series contains SoC and board integration for
> 1. RSPI in the r7s72100 aka RZ/A1H SoC on the Genmai reference board,
> 2. QSPI in the r8a7791 aka R-Car M2 SoC on the Koelsch reference board.
> It was rebased on top of renesas-devel-v3.14-rc1-20140204.
>
> It was tested on the r7s72100-based Genmai reference board using loopback
> mode, and on the r8a7791-based Koelsch reference board using the Spansion
> s25fl512s SPI FLASH.
>
> - [v5 01/11] ARM: shmobile: r7s72100 clock: Add RSPI clocks
> - [v5 02/11] ARM: shmobile: genmai legacy: Add RSPI support
> - [v3 03/11] ARM: shmobile: genmai defconfig: Enable RSPI
> - [v3 04/11] ARM: shmobile: r7s72100 clock: Add RSPI clocks for DT
> - [v5 05/11] ARM: shmobile: r7s72100 dtsi: Add RSPI nodes
> - [v4 06/11] ARM: shmobile: r8a7791 clock: add QSPI clocks
> - [v4 07/11] ARM: shmobile: koelsch legacy: Add QSPI support
> - [v4 08/11] ARM: shmobile: koelsch defconfig: Enable RSPI and
> - [v3 09/11] ARM: shmobile: r8a7791 dtsi: Add QSPI node
> - [v3 10/11] ARM: shmobile: koelsch dts: Add QSPI nodes
> - [v2 11/11] ARM: shmobile: lager legacy: Switch QSPI to named IRQs
Above I see v2, v3, v4 and v5 patches.
While I can make sense of this it makes it cumbersome to refer to the
series as a whole.
Bob, can you take a look at '"[PATCH 00/11] ARM: shmobile: RSPI RZ and
QSPI SoC and board", posted on Tuesday the 2nd, which includes v2, v3,
v4 and v5 patches'?
What would make my life easier would be if the entire series was v5 and
all the patches contained in it were v5. Then I could just ask Bob to look
at "[PATCH v5 00/11] ARM: shmobile: RSPI RZ and QSPI SoC and board"
There is no Bob but I do ask people these kind of questions :)
> All of these should be safe to apply, without compile-time or run-time
> dependencies on other parts.
> Actual functioning for some parts may depend on RSPI work queued up for
> 3.15 in the spi tree.
>
> Compared to previous submission, the following have been postponed:
> - [v4 03/15] [WIP] ARM: shmobile: genmai legacy: Add preliminary RSPI
> pinmux setup
> This depends on the to-be-written non-DT pinmux configuration for
> r7s72100.
> - [v4 07/15] ARM: shmobile: genmai reference dts: Add RSPI nodes
> This depends on Magnus' "ARM: shmobile: r7s72100 GPIO and PINCTRL device
> nodes"
> - [v1 14/15] ARM: shmobile: koelsch legacy: Enable Quad SPI transfers for
> the SPI FLASH
> - [v1 15/15] ARM: shmobile: koelsch dts: Enable Quad SPI transfers
> These two depend on the RSPI Dual/Quad work queued up in the spi tree.
> After applying the r8a7791/Koelsch patches above, the mainline RSPI/QSPI
> driver will work fine. But enabling Quad SPI transfers in board support
> code or DT without the corresponding support in the RSPI driver would
> cause a regression.
>
> Please apply this series, Thanks!
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists