linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ACPI hotplug: Fix panic on eject to ejected device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1391615569.5612.15.camel@misato.fc.hp.com>
Date:	Wed, 05 Feb 2014 08:52:49 -0700
From:	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI hotplug: Fix panic on eject to ejected device

On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 11:05 +0000, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 04, 2014 05:48:28 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > When an eject request is sent to an ejected ACPI device, the following
> > panic occurs:
> > 
> >  ACPI: \_SB_.SCK3.CPU3: ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST event
> >  BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000070
> >  IP: [<ffffffff813a7cfe>] acpi_device_hotplug+0x10b/0x33b
> > 	:
> >  Call Trace:
> >  [<ffffffff813a24da>] acpi_hotplug_work_fn+0x1c/0x27
> >  [<ffffffff8109cbe5>] process_one_work+0x175/0x430
> >  [<ffffffff8109d7db>] worker_thread+0x11b/0x3a0
> > 
> > This is becase device->handler is NULL in acpi_device_hotplug().
> > This case was used to fail in acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() as the target
> > had no acpi_deivce.  However, acpi_device now exists after ejection.
> > 
> > Added a check to verify if acpi_device->handler is valid for an
> > eject request in acpi_hotplug_notify_cb().  Note that handler passed
> > from an argument is still valid while acpi_device->handler is NULL.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/scan.c |    5 +++--
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > index 7384158..5cf6adf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > @@ -484,7 +484,6 @@ static void acpi_device_hotplug(void *data, u32 src)
> >  static void acpi_hotplug_notify_cb(acpi_handle handle, u32 type, void *data)
> >  {
> >  	u32 ost_code = ACPI_OST_SC_NON_SPECIFIC_FAILURE;
> > -	struct acpi_scan_handler *handler = data;
> >  	struct acpi_device *adev;
> >  	acpi_status status;
> >  
> > @@ -500,7 +499,9 @@ static void acpi_hotplug_notify_cb(acpi_handle handle, u32 type, void *data)
> >  		break;
> >  	case ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST:
> >  		acpi_handle_debug(handle, "ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST event\n");
> > -		if (!handler->hotplug.enabled) {
> > +		if (!adev->handler)
> > +			goto err_out;
> > +		if (!adev->handler->hotplug.enabled) {
> >  			acpi_handle_err(handle, "Eject disabled\n");
> >  			ost_code = ACPI_OST_SC_EJECT_NOT_SUPPORTED;
> >  			goto err_out;
> 
> OK, I'll queue this up for the next pull request, but it actually isn't safe,
> because adev is not really guaranteed to exist here (it might have been deleted
> already when this function is running).

It should be safe since acpi_bus_get_device() fails in this function
when adev does not exist. 


> The series of 24 patches I've sent recently addresses this problem, but they
> are 3.15 material, so we need a stop-gap for 3.14.

Great!  Thanks,
-Toshi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/