linux-kernel - [PATCH -mm v15 02/13] memcg: consolidate callers of memcg_cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 5 Feb 2014 22:39:18 +0400
From:	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
To:	<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	<dchinner@...hat.com>, <mhocko@...e.cz>, <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	<glommer@...il.com>, <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	<devel@...nvz.org>, Glauber Costa <glommer@...nvz.org>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH -mm v15 02/13] memcg: consolidate callers of memcg_cache_id

From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...nvz.org>

Each caller of memcg_cache_id ends up sanitizing its parameters in its own way.
Now that the memcg_cache_id itself is more robust, we can consolidate this.

Also, as suggested by Michal, a special helper memcg_cache_idx is used when the
result is expected to be used directly as an array index to make sure we never
access in a negative index.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@...nvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c |   48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 75758fc5c50c..9d1245dc993a 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3008,6 +3008,30 @@ static inline bool memcg_can_account_kmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 }
 
 /*
+ * helper for acessing a memcg's index. It will be used as an index in the
+ * child cache array in kmem_cache, and also to derive its name. This function
+ * will return -1 when this is not a kmem-limited memcg.
+ */
+int memcg_cache_id(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+{
+	if (!memcg || !memcg_can_account_kmem(memcg))
+		return -1;
+	return memcg->kmemcg_id;
+}
+
+/*
+ * This helper around memcg_cache_id is not intented for use outside memcg
+ * core. It is meant for places where the cache id is used directly as an array
+ * index
+ */
+static int memcg_cache_idx(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+{
+	int ret = memcg_cache_id(memcg);
+	BUG_ON(ret < 0);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/*
  * This is a bit cumbersome, but it is rarely used and avoids a backpointer
  * in the memcg_cache_params struct.
  */
@@ -3017,7 +3041,7 @@ static struct kmem_cache *memcg_params_to_cache(struct memcg_cache_params *p)
 
 	VM_BUG_ON(p->is_root_cache);
 	cachep = p->root_cache;
-	return cache_from_memcg_idx(cachep, memcg_cache_id(p->memcg));
+	return cache_from_memcg_idx(cachep, memcg_cache_idx(p->memcg));
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SLABINFO
@@ -3103,18 +3127,6 @@ static void memcg_uncharge_kmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, u64 size)
 		css_put(&memcg->css);
 }
 
-/*
- * helper for acessing a memcg's index. It will be used as an index in the
- * child cache array in kmem_cache, and also to derive its name. This function
- * will return -1 when this is not a kmem-limited memcg.
- */
-int memcg_cache_id(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
-{
-	if (!memcg || !memcg_can_account_kmem(memcg))
-		return -1;
-	return memcg->kmemcg_id;
-}
-
 static size_t memcg_caches_array_size(int num_groups)
 {
 	ssize_t size;
@@ -3246,7 +3258,7 @@ void memcg_register_cache(struct kmem_cache *s)
 
 	root = s->memcg_params->root_cache;
 	memcg = s->memcg_params->memcg;
-	id = memcg_cache_id(memcg);
+	id = memcg_cache_idx(memcg);
 
 	css_get(&memcg->css);
 
@@ -3288,7 +3300,7 @@ void memcg_unregister_cache(struct kmem_cache *s)
 
 	root = s->memcg_params->root_cache;
 	memcg = s->memcg_params->memcg;
-	id = memcg_cache_id(memcg);
+	id = memcg_cache_idx(memcg);
 
 	mutex_lock(&memcg->slab_caches_mutex);
 	list_del(&s->memcg_params->list);
@@ -3573,6 +3585,7 @@ struct kmem_cache *__memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
 {
 	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
 	struct kmem_cache *memcg_cachep;
+	int id;
 
 	VM_BUG_ON(!cachep->memcg_params);
 	VM_BUG_ON(!cachep->memcg_params->is_root_cache);
@@ -3583,10 +3596,11 @@ struct kmem_cache *__memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(rcu_dereference(current->mm->owner));
 
-	if (!memcg_can_account_kmem(memcg))
+	id = memcg_cache_id(memcg);
+	if (id < 0)
 		goto out;
 
-	memcg_cachep = cache_from_memcg_idx(cachep, memcg_cache_id(memcg));
+	memcg_cachep = cache_from_memcg_idx(cachep, id);
 	if (likely(memcg_cachep)) {
 		cachep = memcg_cachep;
 		goto out;
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/