linux-kernel - [PATCH -mm v15 11/13] memcg: flush memcg items upon memcg destruction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c7adb5da42c86aff94884521637409bbec3c19e5.1391624021.git.vdavydov@parallels.com>
Date:	Wed, 5 Feb 2014 22:39:27 +0400
From:	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
To:	<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	<dchinner@...hat.com>, <mhocko@...e.cz>, <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	<glommer@...il.com>, <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	<devel@...nvz.org>, Glauber Costa <glommer@...nvz.org>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH -mm v15 11/13] memcg: flush memcg items upon memcg destruction

From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...nvz.org>

When a memcg is destroyed, it won't be imediately released until all
objects are gone. This means that if a memcg is restarted with the very
same workload - a very common case, the objects already cached won't be
billed to the new memcg. This is mostly undesirable since a container
can exploit this by restarting itself every time it reaches its limit,
and then coming up again with a fresh new limit.

Since now we have targeted reclaim, I sustain that we should assume that
a memcg that is destroyed should be flushed away. It makes perfect sense
if we assume that a memcg that goes away most likely indicates an
isolated workload that is terminated.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@...nvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 27f6d795090a..aed1456015cf 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -6155,12 +6155,40 @@ static void memcg_destroy_kmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 	memcg_destroy_all_lrus(memcg);
 }
 
+static void memcg_drop_slab(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+{
+	struct shrink_control shrink = {
+		.gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
+		.target_mem_cgroup = memcg,
+	};
+	unsigned long nr_objects;
+
+	nodes_setall(shrink.nodes_to_scan);
+	do {
+		nr_objects = shrink_slab(&shrink, 1000, 1000);
+	} while (nr_objects > 10);
+}
+
 static void kmem_cgroup_css_offline(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 {
 	if (!memcg_kmem_is_active(memcg))
 		return;
 
 	/*
+	 * When a memcg is destroyed, it won't be imediately released until all
+	 * objects are gone. This means that if a memcg is restarted with the
+	 * very same workload - a very common case, the objects already cached
+	 * won't be billed to the new memcg. This is mostly undesirable since a
+	 * container can exploit this by restarting itself every time it
+	 * reaches its limit, and then coming up again with a fresh new limit.
+	 *
+	 * Therefore a memcg that is destroyed should be flushed away. It makes
+	 * perfect sense if we assume that a memcg that goes away indicates an
+	 * isolated workload that is terminated.
+	 */
+	memcg_drop_slab(memcg);
+
+	/*
 	 * kmem charges can outlive the cgroup. In the case of slab
 	 * pages, for instance, a page contain objects from various
 	 * processes. As we prevent from taking a reference for every
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/