[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402051501240.17670@pianoman.cluster.toy>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 15:04:03 -0500 (EST)
From: Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: junk@...af.co.uk, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf,x86,p6: Add userspace RDPMC quirk for P6
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 02:37:29PM -0500, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Feb 2014, Vince Weaver wrote:
> >
> > > Has someone actually hit this bug? People used PAPI/perfctr on these
> > > machines for years, and it uses rdpmc by default so I would think it would
> > > show up if it were an issue. I should check the perfctr code to see if it
> > > had some sort of check.
> >
> > I can verify the perfctr code does have a case for PPRO errata 26, but it
> > only disables things on pentium pros with stepping less than 9.
>
> The doc said 0xB1, right? Should we keep it at that? Its not like
> there's a lot of PPro machines left out there, so better safe than
> sorry.
mfg steping "sB1" which means processor stepping 9. See page 15 of the
document linked in the original patch.
I used to have a Pentium Pro that was apparently affected by this erratum
but not any more. The oldest machine I test perf stuff on is a
Pentium II.
Vince
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists