[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2360514.bLFmJYMItS@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 22:53:01 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: "Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, pavel@....cz, len.brown@...el.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
zhuangzhi.li@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Enabling the asynchronous threads for other phases
On Monday, January 20, 2014 04:44:34 PM Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch series are for enabling the asynchronous threads for the phases
> resume_noirq, resume_early, suspend_noirq and suspend_late.
>
> Just like commit 5af84b82701a and 97df8c12995, with async threads it will
> reduce the system suspending and resuming time significantly.
>
> With these patches, in my test platform, it saved 80% time in resume_noirq
> phase.
>
> Has done the suspend-resume stress test for a long time, please help to
> review.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> [PATCH 1/5] PM: Adding two flags for async suspend_noirq and
> [PATCH 2/5] PM: Enabling the asynchronous threads for resume_noirq
> [PATCH 3/5] PM: Enabling the asyncronous threads for resume_early
> [PATCH 4/5] PM: Enabling the asyncronous threads for suspend_noirq
> [PATCH 5/5] PM: Enabling the asyncronous threads for suspend_late
I've applied this to the bleeding-edge branch of the linux-pm.git tree, with
minor changes related to coding style, white space etc.
Can you please verify that the bleeding-edge branch works for you as expected?
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists