[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140205140113.f02dd196c88ad2cf55123b9e@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 14:01:13 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] mm/memblock: add memblock_get_current_limit
On Tue, 4 Feb 2014 16:02:30 -0800 Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> Appart from setting the limit of memblock, it's also useful to be able
> to get the limit to avoid recalculating it every time. Add the function
> to do so.
Looks OK to me. Your "[PATCHv2 2/2] arm: Get rid of meminfo" did not
make it into my inbox or into my lkml folder, but I found it at
lkml.org so the server did send it. I'm not sure what's up with that.
Please include [patch 1/2] within or alongside [patch 2/2] so they both
get merged via the same route, which is presumably an arm tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists