[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140205220934.19080.30046.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 03:39:35 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: paulus@...ba.org, oleg@...hat.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tj@...nel.org,
walken@...gle.com, ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 27/51] x86, kvm: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:
get_online_cpus();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
put_online_cpus();
This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).
Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:
cpu_maps_update_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);
/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
cpu_maps_update_done();
Fix the kvm code in x86 by using this latter form of callback registration.
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 39c28f09..e3893b7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -5365,7 +5365,8 @@ static void kvm_timer_init(void)
int cpu;
max_tsc_khz = tsc_khz;
- register_hotcpu_notifier(&kvmclock_cpu_notifier_block);
+
+ cpu_maps_update_begin();
if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC)) {
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
struct cpufreq_policy policy;
@@ -5382,6 +5383,10 @@ static void kvm_timer_init(void)
pr_debug("kvm: max_tsc_khz = %ld\n", max_tsc_khz);
for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
smp_call_function_single(cpu, tsc_khz_changed, NULL, 1);
+
+ __register_hotcpu_notifier(&kvmclock_cpu_notifier_block);
+ cpu_maps_update_done();
+
}
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_vcpu *, current_vcpu);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists