[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkda6SFeDKftn7he++dbkuqHwMF5M5ZbucmiWfASfJq0GbA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 09:32:59 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] backlight: add PWM dependencies
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com> wrote:
> In the case of "CONFIG_HAVE_PWM=y && CONFIG_PWM=n", it makes
> the problem.
>
> The HAVE_PWM symbol is only for legacy platforms that provide
> the PWM API without using the generic framework. PXA looks to
> use the generic PWM framework. Then, how about removing
> "select HAVE_PWM" from PXA as below?
>
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/Kconfig
> @@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ comment "Intel/Marvell Dev Platforms (sorted by hardware release time)"
> config MACH_PXA3XX_DT
> bool "Support PXA3xx platforms from device tree"
> select CPU_PXA300
> - select HAVE_PWM
> select POWER_SUPPLY
> select PXA3xx
> select USE_OF
> @@ -23,12 +22,10 @@ config ARCH_LUBBOCK
>
> config MACH_MAINSTONE
> bool "Intel HCDDBBVA0 Development Platform (aka Mainstone)"
> - select HAVE_PWM
> select PXA27x
>
> config MACH_ZYLONITE
> bool
> - select HAVE_PWM
> select PXA3xx
Looks like the right solution to me.
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists