[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140206004431.GB1308@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 16:44:31 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: paulus@...ba.org, oleg@...hat.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...nel.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tj@...nel.org, walken@...gle.com,
ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
lm-sensors@...sensors.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 43/51] hwmon, via-cputemp: Fix CPU hotplug callback
registration
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 03:42:19AM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
> initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
> below:
>
> get_online_cpus();
>
> for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> init_cpu(cpu);
>
> register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
>
> put_online_cpus();
>
> This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
> cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
> with CPU hotplug operations).
>
> Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
> registration is:
>
> cpu_maps_update_begin();
>
> for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> init_cpu(cpu);
>
> /* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
> __register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);
>
> cpu_maps_update_done();
>
>
> Fix the hwmon via-cputemp code by using this latter form of callback
> registration.
>
> Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> Cc: lm-sensors@...sensors.org
> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Applied.
Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists