lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 6 Feb 2014 12:08:43 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	John Huston <jhuston@...hat.com>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the fscache tree

Hi David,

After merging the fscache tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:

fs/cachefiles/bind.c: In function 'cachefiles_daemon_unbind':
fs/cachefiles/bind.c:361:4: error: too few arguments to function 'vfs_unlink'
    ret = vfs_unlink(cache->root->d_inode, dentry);
    ^
In file included from fs/cachefiles/bind.c:18:0:
include/linux/fs.h:1458:12: note: declared here
 extern int vfs_unlink(struct inode *, struct dentry *, struct inode **);
            ^

Caused by commit ab3d73f3ce3d ("Cachefiles: Add features that make sanity
checking easier") from the fscache tree interacting with commit
b21996e36c8e ("locks: break delegations on unlink") from Linus' tree
(which entered Linus' tree before v3.13-rc1).  Does this build for you?

I have used the fscache tree from next-20140205 for today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists