[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140206152944.GG20269@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 16:29:44 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rientjes@...gle.com, penberg@...nel.org,
cl@...ux.com, glommer@...il.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] memcg, slab: never try to merge memcg caches
On Thu 06-02-14 18:15:50, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> On 02/06/2014 06:07 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 04-02-14 19:27:19, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > [...]
> >> What does this patch change? Actually, it introduces no functional
> >> changes - it only remove the code trying to find an alias for a memcg
> >> cache, because it will fail anyway. So this is rather a cleanup.
> > But this also means that two different memcgs might share the same cache
> > and so the pages for that cache, no?
>
> No, because in this patch I explicitly forbid to merge memcg caches by
> this hunk:
>
> @@ -200,9 +200,11 @@ kmem_cache_create_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> const char *name, size_t size,
> */
> flags &= CACHE_CREATE_MASK;
>
> - s = __kmem_cache_alias(memcg, name, size, align, flags, ctor);
> - if (s)
> - goto out_unlock;
> + if (!memcg) {
> + s = __kmem_cache_alias(name, size, align, flags, ctor);
> + if (s)
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
Ohh, that was the missing part. Thanks and sorry I have missed it. Maybe
it is worth mentioning in the changelog?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists