lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 6 Feb 2014 08:53:02 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <>
Cc:	"" <>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
	Andrew Morton <>,
	Ingo Molnar <>,
	Will Deacon <>,
	Paul McKenney <>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] arch: Sanitize atomic_t bitwise ops

On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Peter Zijlstra <> wrote:
> Many archs have atomic_{set,clear}_mask() but not all. Remove these
> and provide a comprehensive set of bitops:
>   atomic{,64}_{and,or,xor}{,_return}()

Who uses these, and why?

The "_return()" versions of atomic ops are noticeably slower and more
complex on common architectures (ie x86), and apparently there is no
use of them since they didn't exist.

So why add them? Just to encourage people to do bad things?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists