lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 6 Feb 2014 23:33:23 +0000
From:	"Joseph S. Myers" <>
To:	Torvald Riegel <>
CC:	Will Deacon <>,
	Ramana Radhakrishnan <>,
	David Howells <>,
	Peter Zijlstra <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework

On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Torvald Riegel wrote:

> I think that if we have different options, there needs to be agreement
> on which to choose across the compilers, at the very least.  I don't
> quite know how this looks like for GCC and LLVM, for example.

I'm not sure we even necessarily get compatibility for the alignment of 
_Atomic types yet (and no ABI document I've seen discusses that issue).

Joseph S. Myers
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists