[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <001801cf23de$f1b708d0$d5251a70$%han@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:31:06 +0900
From: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
To: 'Lars-Peter Clausen' <lars@...afoo.de>
Cc: 'Andrew Morton' <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
'Alessandro Zummo' <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, 'Jingoo Han' <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
'Thierry Reding' <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] rtc: rtc-jz4740: Use devm_ioremap_resource()
On Friday, February 07, 2014 5:13 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 02/07/2014 08:58 AM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> [...]
> > - rtc->base = devm_ioremap_nocache(&pdev->dev, rtc->mem->start,
> > - resource_size(rtc->mem));
> > - if (!rtc->base) {
> > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to ioremap mmio memory\n");
> > - return -EBUSY;
> > - }
> > + mem->flags &= ~IORESOURCE_CACHEABLE;
>
> You shouldn't be modifying the resource, strictly speaking it is not owned
> by the device. And IORESOURCE_CACHEABLE is never set for this device anyway.
(+cc Thierry Reding)
Hi Lars-Peter Clausen,
Do you mean that resource's flags should NOT be modified by the
device driver, right?
Then, without 'mem->flags &= ~IORESOURCE_CACHEABLE', is it possible
that devm_ioremap_nocache() can be called at devm_ioremap_resource()?
Thierry,
Do you have any comments on this?
Thank you.
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
>
> > + rtc->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, mem);
> > + if (IS_ERR(rtc->base))
> > + return PTR_ERR(rtc->base);
> >
> > spin_lock_init(&rtc->lock);
> >
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists