[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201402071040.58087.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:40:57 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
Cc: "'Thierry Reding'" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"'Linus Walleij'" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"'Russell King - ARM Linux'" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"'Eric Miao'" <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] backlight: add PWM dependencies
On Friday 07 February 2014, Jingoo Han wrote:
> How about the following?
>
> [PATCH 1/7] ARM: pxa: don't select HAVE_PWM
> [PATCH 2/7] ARM: lpc32xx: don't select HAVE_PWM
> [PATCH 3/7] ARM: remove HAVE_PWM config option
> [PATCH 4/7] MIPS: jz4740: don't select HAVE_PWM
> [PATCH 5/7] Input: max8997_haptic: remove HAVE_PWM dependencies
> [PATCH 6/7] Input: pwm-beepe: remove HAVE_PWM dependencies
> [PATCH 7/7] pwm: don't use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_PWM)
>
> I would like to merge it through PWM tree.
> After merging these patches, all HAVE_PWM will be removed from
> the mainline kernel. Thank you. :-)
Sounds godo to me, thanks a lot for taking care of this!
I don't see any inter-dependencies between the various patches,
so we could also take the first three through the arm-soc tree
to avoid conflicts with other changes (or possibly the third
one through rmk's ARM tree, if he prefers).
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists