linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/5] arch: s/smp_mb__(before|after)_(atomic|clear)_(dec,inc,bit)/smp_mb_

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 7 Feb 2014 09:52:41 +0000
From:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/5] arch:
 s/smp_mb__(before|after)_(atomic|clear)_(dec,inc,bit)/smp_mb__\1/g

On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 07:12:04PM +0000, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 02:48:28PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Because atomic ops are implemented the same across an architecture,
> > the current incomplete set of extra barriers:
> >
> >   smp_mb__before_atomic_inc()
> >   smp_mb__after_atomic_inc()
> >   smp_mb__before_atomic_dec()
> >   smp_mb__after_atomic_dec()
> >   smp_mb__before_clear_bit()
> >   smp_mb__after_clear_bit()
> >
> > is both incomplete and superfluous.
> >
> > It is incomplete because there are far more atomic operations that do
> > not return values -- such as atomic_add(), set_bit() etc. And it is
> > superfluous because they're all the same anyway.
> >
> > Simplify things by reducing the triplicate set into a single set of
> > barriers that is valid for all void atomic ops:
> >
> >   smp_mb__before_atomic()
> >   smp_mb__after_atomic()
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> 
> I very much like the API shrinkage.  The RCU changes are good, and
> I believe that the rest is OK too, though my eyes were going a bit
> buggy towards the end...
> 
> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

... and the arm[64] parts look fine to me.

  Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>

Usual comment about upcoming conflicts :)

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/