[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1391736923-30765-7-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:35:08 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@...g.com.ar>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/21] perf report: Cache cumulative callchains
It is possble that a callchain has cycles or recursive calls. In that
case it'll end up having entries more than 100% overhead in the
output. In order to prevent such entries, cache each callchain node
and skip if same entry already cumulated.
Tested-by: Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
---
tools/perf/util/hist.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/hist.c b/tools/perf/util/hist.c
index 15e619d6654f..7529d216986a 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/hist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/hist.c
@@ -709,7 +709,22 @@ static int
iter_prepare_cumulative_entry(struct hist_entry_iter *iter __maybe_unused,
struct addr_location *al __maybe_unused)
{
+ struct hist_entry **he_cache;
+
callchain_cursor_commit(&callchain_cursor);
+
+ /*
+ * This is for detecting cycles or recursions so that they're
+ * cumulated only one time to prevent entries more than 100%
+ * overhead.
+ */
+ he_cache = malloc(sizeof(*he_cache) * (PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH + 1));
+ if (he_cache == NULL)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ iter->priv = he_cache;
+ iter->curr = 0;
+
return 0;
}
@@ -719,6 +734,7 @@ iter_add_single_cumulative_entry(struct hist_entry_iter *iter,
{
struct perf_evsel *evsel = iter->evsel;
struct perf_sample *sample = iter->sample;
+ struct hist_entry **he_cache = iter->priv;
struct hist_entry *he;
he = __hists__add_entry(&evsel->hists, al, iter->parent, NULL, NULL,
@@ -727,6 +743,8 @@ iter_add_single_cumulative_entry(struct hist_entry_iter *iter,
if (he == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
+ he_cache[iter->curr++] = he;
+
return hist_entry__inc_addr_samples(he, evsel->idx, al->addr);
}
@@ -751,7 +769,29 @@ iter_add_next_cumulative_entry(struct hist_entry_iter *iter,
{
struct perf_evsel *evsel = iter->evsel;
struct perf_sample *sample = iter->sample;
+ struct hist_entry **he_cache = iter->priv;
struct hist_entry *he;
+ struct hist_entry he_tmp = {
+ .cpu = al->cpu,
+ .thread = al->thread,
+ .comm = thread__comm(al->thread),
+ .ip = al->addr,
+ .ms = {
+ .map = al->map,
+ .sym = al->sym,
+ },
+ .parent = iter->parent,
+ };
+ int i;
+
+ /*
+ * Check if there's duplicate entries in the callchain.
+ * It's possible that it has cycles or recursive calls.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < iter->curr; i++) {
+ if (hist_entry__cmp(he_cache[i], &he_tmp) == 0)
+ return 0;
+ }
he = __hists__add_entry(&evsel->hists, al, iter->parent, NULL, NULL,
sample->period, sample->weight,
@@ -759,6 +799,8 @@ iter_add_next_cumulative_entry(struct hist_entry_iter *iter,
if (he == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
+ he_cache[iter->curr++] = he;
+
return hist_entry__inc_addr_samples(he, evsel->idx, al->addr);
}
@@ -772,6 +814,7 @@ iter_finish_cumulative_entry(struct hist_entry_iter *iter,
evsel->hists.stats.total_period += sample->period;
hists__inc_nr_events(&evsel->hists, PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE);
+ zfree(&iter->priv);
return 0;
}
--
1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists