linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 08/15] ata: ahci

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52F4B682.2000201@ti.com>
Date:	Fri, 7 Feb 2014 12:33:38 +0200
From:	Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	<kishon@...com>
CC:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, <balbi@...com>, <bcousson@...libre.com>,
	<tony@...mide.com>, <balajitk@...com>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/15] ata: ahci_platform: Manage SATA PHY

Hi,

On 09/23/2013 04:59 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 09/23/2013 03:59 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 23-09-2013 11:37, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>
>>>>>     Not sure why you asked -- I'm not using this driver, neither I'm
>>
>>>> Well, you have better grip of what's going on in the embedded world
>>>> than me.  I'm mostly curious whether adding dependency on PHY is okay.
>>
>>> There is no hard dependency on presence of PHY. The driver will continue
>>> as usual if devm_phy_get() fails.
>>> I hope selecting GENERIC_PHY in Kconfig is not an issue.
>>
>>    Selecting in the AHCI_PLATFORM section? It seems I have overlooked it. No, I don't think it's a good idea. The generic PHY functions seem to be stubbed when GENERIC_PHY=n.
>>
> OK I will remove the select then.

If I remove the select then build fails like so if we set CONFIG_GENERIC_PHY to 'm' and CONFIG_SATA_AHCI_PLATFORM to 'y'

drivers/built-in.o: In function `ahci_platform_enable_resources':
(.text+0x162647): undefined reference to `phy_init'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `ahci_platform_enable_resources':
(.text+0x16267c): undefined reference to `phy_power_on'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `ahci_platform_enable_resources':
(.text+0x162694): undefined reference to `phy_exit'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `ahci_platform_disable_resources':
(.text+0x1626af): undefined reference to `phy_power_off'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `ahci_platform_disable_resources':
(.text+0x1626b7): undefined reference to `phy_exit'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `ahci_platform_get_resources':
(.text+0x162768): undefined reference to `devm_phy_get'
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1

This means we need to make CONFIG_SATA_AHCI_PLATFORM depend on CONFIG_GENERIC_PHY or
select it.

OR

Generic PHY layer must be fixed so that the API's are always built in.

What is the better option? I believe making the PHY API's always built in is the better option.

cheers,
-roger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/