lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 11:44:00 +0000 From: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com> Subject: [PATCH 3.11 021/233] writeback: Fix data corruption on NFS 3.11.10.4 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> commit f9b0e058cbd04ada76b13afffa7e1df830543c24 upstream. Commit 4f8ad655dbc8 "writeback: Refactor writeback_single_inode()" added a condition to skip clean inode. However this is wrong in WB_SYNC_ALL mode because there we also want to wait for outstanding writeback on possibly clean inode. This was causing occasional data corruption issues on NFS because it uses sync_inode() to make sure all outstanding writes are flushed to the server before truncating the inode and with sync_inode() returning prematurely file was sometimes extended back by an outstanding write after it was truncated. So modify the test to also check for pages under writeback in WB_SYNC_ALL mode. Fixes: 4f8ad655dbc82cf05d2edc11e66b78a42d38bf93 Reported-and-tested-by: Dan Duval <dan.duval@...cle.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com> --- fs/fs-writeback.c | 15 +++++++++------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c index 68851ff..52e5934 100644 --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c @@ -508,13 +508,16 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb, } WARN_ON(inode->i_state & I_SYNC); /* - * Skip inode if it is clean. We don't want to mess with writeback - * lists in this function since flusher thread may be doing for example - * sync in parallel and if we move the inode, it could get skipped. So - * here we make sure inode is on some writeback list and leave it there - * unless we have completely cleaned the inode. + * Skip inode if it is clean and we have no outstanding writeback in + * WB_SYNC_ALL mode. We don't want to mess with writeback lists in this + * function since flusher thread may be doing for example sync in + * parallel and if we move the inode, it could get skipped. So here we + * make sure inode is on some writeback list and leave it there unless + * we have completely cleaned the inode. */ - if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY)) + if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) && + (wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL || + !mapping_tagged(inode->i_mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_WRITEBACK))) goto out; inode->i_state |= I_SYNC; spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); -- 1.8.3.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists