[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52F4F502.2010703@elopez.com.ar>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:00:18 -0300
From: Emilio López <emilio@...pez.com.ar>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
CC: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: respect the clock dependencies in of_clk_init
El 07/02/14 11:49, Gregory CLEMENT escribió:
> On 07/02/2014 15:43, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 09:24:30AM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:06:08AM -0300, Emilio López wrote:
>>>
>>> [snip a great explanation]
>>>
>>> Guys, can I get some Tested-by's on this?
>>>
>>
>> In case someone missed Emilio's comment about it, I gave his oneliner
>> a test on A370 Reference Design. It worked just as well as Sebastian's.
>
> Well ok it's working but this patch is not better than Sebastian, it is
> even worth. I don't think it is a good idea at all to totally ignore the
> information given by the device tree.
With a bit more work, you can replace the clk_get magic with a call to
of_clk_get_parent_name() or similar to be able to keep overriding stuff
from DT. This way it would completely match the behaviour on
mvebu_coreclk_setup (default to "tclk", allow overriding with DT).
Emilio
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists