[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140207152828.GA11557@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 07:28:28 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Zoran Markovic <zoran.markovic@...aro.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Shaibal Dutta <shaibal.dutta@...adcom.com>,
Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>,
Xenia Ragiadakou <burzalodowa@...il.com>,
Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>,
Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@...lesie.net>,
Matthias Beyer <mail@...ermatthias.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Pugliese <thomas.pugliese@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv2] usb: move hub init and LED blink work to power
efficient workqueue
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:20:57AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> Please don't top-post.
>
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Zoran Markovic wrote:
>
> > I believe there may still be use cases where you want to wake up the
> > same CPU that scheduled the work.
>
> Won't the majority of cases not care which CPU is used? Therefore,
> shouldn't the default behavior be to use the power-efficient work
> queue?
>
> > Thanks for the Ack. Can you please queue this for 3.14?
>
> That's up to Greg KH. He may decide it's not important enough to go
> into 3.14, and delay it until 3.15.
It's 3.15 material, as it doesn't fix a regression at this point in
time.
I'll queue it up when I get to it in a week or so, thanks.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists