[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2E89032DDAA8B9408CB92943514A03376BACFBC6@SW-EX-MBX01.diasemi.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 15:45:11 +0000
From: "Opensource [Adam Thomson]" <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"Opensource [Adam Thomson]" <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
CC: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 3/8] mfd: da9055: Add DT support for PMIC
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 11:03:18AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> Can you break this up please.
>
> Bindings should be separate to the binding document.
Right, fine. Figured as they were directly related they should be in one patch
but will separate them.
> Entangling the i2c_device_id table with the of_device_id table sounds
> a bit too wacky for my liking. Where do you even use it?
>
You're right. Is not used so can remove it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists