linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] x86/kaslr for v3.14

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 7 Feb 2014 11:24:09 -0500
From:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Cong Ding <dinggnu@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>,
	Michael Davidson <md@...gle.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
	Kexec Mailing List <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/kaslr for v3.14

On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 08:04:13AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 02/07/2014 06:49 AM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Kees,
> > 
> > Dave Young is testing kdump with kaslr enabled. He is facing some issues.
> > 
> > One issue he mentioned is that when second kernel boots, it might be
> > placed in an area which is outside the reserved area for second kernel.
> > 
> > We reserve a certain memory for second kernel. And modify memory map of
> > second kernel using memmap=exactmap parameter. Looks like kernel placement
> > is happening before memmap=exactmap takes effect. And that seems to be
> > the reason that second kernel can be placed outside the reserved memory.
> > 
> > IOW, memmap=exactmap and kaslr don't work together. Is it possible to
> > first let memmap=exactmap take affect and then kaslr does its job. Or it
> > is too late by the time memmap=exactmap is parsed.
> > 
> > As a workaround, Dave is currently using "nokaslr" command line parameter
> > for second kernel. He is still facing issues where makedumpfile segment
> > faults. He is looking into it further.
> > 
> > I thought I will atleast bring up with issue of memmap=exactmap and kaslr
> > being incompatible.
> > 
> 
> Yes, because memmap=exactmap gets parsed too late; kaslr assumes that
> the e820 information passed to it is actually correct.
> 
> Yet another cause of breakage caused by the decision on the part of
> kdump to rely on command-line options.

[CC kexec mailing list]

Ok, I think this is high time we change kexec-tools to not use
memmap=exactmap and start passing modified memory map in bootparams. I
think only concern with that change was backward compatibility of
kexec-tools with older kernels.

IIUC, only thing which will be impacted by this change is users of
saved_max_pfn which determine the highest accessible pfn in first
kernel. Some calgary IOMMU code seems to be the only user of it now.

So may be we can create a new command line option say --pass-memmap-cmdline
to kexec-tools which forces old behavior and by default we pass memmap
in bootparams.

Or create --do-not-pass-memmap-cmdline and new users will use it. Default
will be old behavior.

Thansk
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/