[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140207172051.GW20228@joshc.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 11:20:51 -0600
From: Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Alok Chauhan <alokc@...eaurora.org>,
Gilad Avidov <gavidov@...eaurora.org>,
Kiran Gunda <kgunda@...eaurora.org>,
Sagar Dharia <sdharia@...eaurora.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] spi: Add Qualcomm QUP SPI controller support
Hey Mark-
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 05:18:34PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:51:27AM -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote:
>
> > config SPI_QUP
> > tristate "Qualcomm SPI Support with QUP interface"
> > depends on OF
> > depends on ARM
>
> Does this really depend on ARM? If so why?
The ARM dependency is there for the use of _relaxed io accessor
variants.
> > depends on ARCH_MSM_DT || COMPILE_TEST
>
> > With Kumar's pending the ARCH_MSM_DT -> ARCH_QCOM rename, we'll
> > introduce a arm-soc/spi tree dependency here that we'll need to keep
> > track of.
>
> It seems simpler to just depend on MSM_DT || ARCH_QCOM or whatever.
ARCH_MSM_DT is going away, so maybe this is the best option for the
short term (a later patch can remove ARCH_MSM_DT from here at some point
in the future).
Josh
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists