linux-kernel - Re: [RFC, PATCH] mm: map few pages around fault address if they are in page cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:11:39 -0800
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ning Qu <quning@...gle.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] mm: map few pages around fault address if they are
 in page cache

> > There are some extreme cases where workloads could use a lot more memory
> > than before, if they access their memory sparsely in the right pattern.
> 
> Have you noticied that we don't actually allocate any memory: only reuse
> what's already there. Sure, it will increase VmSize, but do we care?

Good point. With that probably readahead is overkill, agree.

We would need it though if we ever do it for anonymous.

-Andi

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/