linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] Add support for MSM's mmio clock/reset controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 06 Feb 2014 21:11:31 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	frowand.list@...il.com
Cc:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] Add support for MSM's mmio clock/reset
 controller

On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 20:15 -0800, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 1/15/2014 10:47 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > The first breaks a reset-controller include ordering requirement. It got
> > an ack so I think we're ok for it to go through the clock tree.
> > 
> 
> < snip >
> 
> checkpatch is whining about patches
> 
>   4
>   5
>   6
>   7
>   8
> 
> (Just for completeness if someone thinks I did not check all the patches,
> it also whines about patch 11, but I think the whining should be ignored,
> and it whines about patch 1 but I think that might be a checkpatch bug.)

Hi Frank.

For patch 1, what checkpatch bug might that be?

I think all the checkpatch whinges in patch 11 are correct.

I didn't check any of 4-8.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/