linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] w1: refcnt fix, skip non-error send, docs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 08 Feb 2014 01:23:43 +0400
From:	zbr@...emap.net
To:	David Fries <david@...es.net>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] w1: refcnt fix, skip non-error send, docs

Hi

07.02.2014, 10:00, "David Fries" <david@...es.net>:

> Here's a patch to implement that.  Is this what you have in mind?
>
> From 4ed65d81b0121a8c191a9833d041484e9097198b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: David Fries <David@...es.net>
> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 23:45:05 -0600
> Subject: [PATCH] w1: correct cn_msg ack, no change or seq + 1
>
> Netlink messages sent from the kernel consists of kernel generated
> notifications for adds or removes, the error message (also indicates
> the message has been processed), and the messages that have data to
> return.  The cn_msg ack is left alone for the first two, and when
> returning data it is the sequence number + 1.  Modifying the code to
> the protocol standard.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Fries <David@...es.net>

Yes, it looks right.
Can you also check that protocol documentation is correct?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/