linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/17] x86, lto: Disable fancy hweight optimizations for LTO v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 8 Feb 2014 12:21:24 -0800
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/17] x86, lto: Disable fancy hweight optimizations for
 LTO v2

On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 10:52:07AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 02/08/2014 12:01 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > The fancy x86 hweight uses different compiler options for the
> > hweight file. This does not work with LTO. Just disable the optimization
> > with LTO
> 
> No, I'm going to NAK this.  This means not using the POPCNT instruction
> if LTO is enabled, and that really isn't an acceptable option.

I thought the use was obscure?

Ok, suppose can just disable LTO for the file.
The only drawback is that the functions will not be optimized away when
not used, as they'll need to be __visible.

-Andi
-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/