[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52F7E0DC.7070103@zytor.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 12:11:08 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
CC: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
aarcange@...hat.com, john.stultz@...aro.org, luto@...capital.net,
xemul@...allels.com, gorcunov@...nvz.org,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, Martin.Runge@...de-schwarz.com,
Andreas.Brief@...de-schwarz.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 8/9] Add 32 bit VDSO time support for 32 bit kernel
On 02/09/2014 03:45 AM, Stefani Seibold wrote:
>>
>> Yes the syscall does, but the vsyscall stub does not (for the !0x80 case)
>
> I cross check all kinds of vsyscall and all do save the ECX registers.
>
> So IMHO i see no register modification other than EAX, which is declared
> as the output register in the asm() directive.
>
That is, indeed, correct, as the 32-bit vsyscall stubs are explicitly
designed to be drop-in replacements for the int $0x80 instruction.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists