[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140209100536.GM12219@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 02:05:36 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, aarcange@...hat.com, john.stultz@...aro.org,
luto@...capital.net, xemul@...allels.com, gorcunov@...nvz.org,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, Martin.Runge@...de-schwarz.com,
Andreas.Brief@...de-schwarz.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 8/9] Add 32 bit VDSO time support for 32 bit kernel
> EBX is a reserved as the base register when compiling with -fPIC.
> Otherwise it get a "error: can't find a register in class 'BREG' while
> reloading 'asm'".
In this case you have to dwarf annotate the push/pop
>
> > Also I if this calls syscall.S:__kernel_vsyscall it clobbers more registers
> > (ecx at least?) and you need to describe that to gcc with a +
>
> Sine ECX is in use as the second parameter it is still marked as
> clobbered.
No input parameters are not clobbered.
> I think it should word... As i know a system call will preserve all
> register expect the EAX, which is marked as in and out for this asm()
> directive.
Yes the syscall does, but the vsyscall stub does not (for the !0x80 case)
> This is due the -m32 compilation, i will get a log of
> "warning: integer constant is too large for 'unsigned long' type",
> because a unsigned long is only 32 bit.
Don't explain it to me, put it into a comment.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists