[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140209125325.GA23318@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 13:53:25 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc: "Ira W. Snyder" <iws@...o.caltech.edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] liblockdep fixes for v3.14
* Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com> wrote:
> The following changes since commit 65370bdf881e20907e7a53abab9b8c0bc5f60a6b:
>
> Merge branch 'linus' into core/locking (2014-02-02 09:43:20 +0100)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
>
> https://github.com/sashalevin/liblockdep.git liblockdep-fixes
>
> for you to fetch changes up to a521b55af18ac72c969c1ba41b660d77dae37357:
>
> liblockdep: add a stub for new rcu_is_watching (2014-02-05 18:03:54 -0500)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Ira W. Snyder (3):
> tools: lockdep: fix initialization code path
> tools: lockdep: fix include of asm/hash.h
> tools: lockdep: add include directory to allow tests to compile
>
> Sasha Levin (2):
> liblockdep: mark runtests.sh as executable
> liblockdep: add a stub for new rcu_is_watching
So I have a couple of nits about the commits:
1)
Please use the following standard tags/prefixes:
tools/liblockdep: Fix initialization code path
...
and also capitalize sentences properly.
2)
Faulty SOB sequences:
Author: Ira W. Snyder <iws@...o.caltech.edu>
Date: Fri Jan 31 13:35:32 2014 -0800
tools: lockdep: add include directory to allow tests to compile
Acked-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ira W. Snyder <iws@...o.caltech.edu>
That's not how we do signoffs, maintainer commits should be:
Signed-off-by: Ira W. Snyder <iws@...o.caltech.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
As a side note, that's not a valid Ack sequence either, which if done
should be the other way around:
Signed-off-by: Ira W. Snyder <iws@...o.caltech.edu>
Acked-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
3)
It's not clear which patch you are referring to here:
This patch mirrors the fix used for perf, titled "tools: perf:
util: fix include for non x86 architectures".
It's neither in the series, nor in upstream.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists