linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/24] rfcomm fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <3E0F3723-029F-4B12-8D77-9790FDBD3227@holtmann.org>
Date:	Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:09:38 -0800
From:	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To:	Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Cc:	"Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
	Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
	Gianluca Anzolin <gianluca@...tospazio.it>,
	Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>,
	Andrey Vihrov <andrey.vihrov@...il.com>,
	Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>,
	"bluez mailin list (linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org)" 
	<linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/24] rfcomm fixes

Hi Peter,

> This patch series addresses a number of previously unknown issues
> with the RFCOMM tty device implementation, in addition to
> addressing the locking regression recently reported [1].
> 
> As Gianluca suggested and I agree, this series first reverts
> 3 of the 4 patches of 3.14-rc1 for bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c.

so for 3.14 we should revert 3 patches. And then the other 21 are intended for 3.15 merge window.

I realize that we still have to deal with some breakage, but we do not want regressions and I clearly not going to take 24 patches for 3.14 at this point in time.

What I can do is take all 24 patches into bluetooth-next and let them sit for 1 week and have people test them. And then we go ahead with reverting 3 patches from 3.14. Does that make sense?

Regards

Marcel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/