[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140210150230.b7f46688093ebc5c45fee870@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:02:30 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>,
Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>, mingo@...nel.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, riel@...hat.com, davidlohr@...com,
hpa@...or.com, andi@...stfloor.org, aswin@...com,
scott.norton@...com, chegu_vinod@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] locking/core patches
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:58:20 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would propose merging the following patches...
>
> The first set is mostly from Jason and tweaks the mutex adaptive
> spinning, AIM7 throughput numbers:
>
> PRE: 100 2000.04 21564.90 2721.29 311.99 3.12 0.01 0.00 99
> POST: 100 2000.04 42603.85 5142.80 311.99 3.12 0.00 0.00 99
What do these columns represent? I'm guessing the large improvement
was in context switches?
> The second set is the qrwlock, although mostly rewritten by me. I didn't do
> much with it other than boot and build a kernel. But I like them because
> of the much better worst case preformance.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists