[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140210154637.dd58edfcbae273034d34c4df@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:46:37 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gleb@...hat.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/14] asmlinkage, kvm: Make kvm_rebooting visible
On Sat, 8 Feb 2014 08:51:57 +0100 Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> kvm_rebooting is referenced from assembler code, thus
> needs to be visible.
So I read the gcc page and looked at the __visible definition but I
still don't really get it. What goes wrong if the __visible isn't
present on these referenced-from-asm identifiers?
> Cc: gleb@...hat.com
> Cc: pbonzini@...hat.com
Grumble. Email addresses go into commits with display names and <>.
At least, 89.3% of them do. Some sucker has to go through these and
fix them up. I'd prefer it not be me ;)
>
> ...
>
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static void kvm_release_pfn_dirty(pfn_t pfn);
> static void mark_page_dirty_in_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
> struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, gfn_t gfn);
>
> -bool kvm_rebooting;
> +__visible bool kvm_rebooting;
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_rebooting);
>
> static bool largepages_enabled = true;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists