[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdX-CFScoxBoE3SMHT4+12mbxBPEL53-HVd+6bkGd3XX_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:49:16 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@...panasonic.com>,
"moderated list:PANASONIC MN10300..." <linux-am33-list@...hat.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/28] Remove DEPRECATED
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
> Am 09.02.2014 21:15, schrieb Paul Bolle:
>> On Sun, 2014-02-09 at 21:04 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> Am 09.02.2014 20:38, schrieb Paul Bolle:
>>>> But now you've enabled a lot of stuff that, as far as I can tell, could
>>>> not have been built since v2.6.39.
>>>
>>> This is by design. If the code does not build/work it needs to be fixed or removed.
>>
>> If that was the design goal of this patch (and similar patches you've
>> sent) it would have been proper to at least say a few words along those
>> lines in the commit explanation.
>
> I assumed that every kernel developer is aware of that fact that unreachable/dead code
> should be removed.
Yes, it should be removed.
But that's not what you did. You did the Kconfig-equivalent of removing a
"#if 0" in a C source file, which causes havoc.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists